Fat-Burning Cardio: High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
Learn how to burn belly fat FAST with this rapid fat loss cardio interval training workout discovered in an Australian Lab using our Workout Muse Audio Interval Training Soundtracks available @ www.RapidFatLossCardio.com
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
Sprinting is a tool- it is one tool- not the be all end all always superior for fat loss nonsense the HIIT scammers use.
Lyle McDonald RULES. He IS correct. Walking is important , sprinting now and then short, and complete recovery between sprints, and diet is the MOST important.
All are important tools with DIET 90 % of it.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
CAMERON ET AL
THE ACCURATE CALORIE BURN
NO b u l l shit here dude.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
I WANT persons to know it is me, MORON LOL!
And belive me I KNOW THE DEAL
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
Its quite sad how you are using around FIVE DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS to try and convince people with your bullshit. Heres an advice, when trying to use multiple accounts be sure to switch up your typing style cuz you all sound the fucking same: Retarded. Fucking spamer
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
So to sum up . The resting metabolic rate of muscle is ONLY 6 calories per pound. HIIT does NOT burn many calories at all. EPOC is next to nothing and meaningless easily wiped out by an oreo cookie.
And even steady state exercise WHICH BURNS TWICE THAT OF HIIT has its severe limitations.
EXERICSE ALONE IS A POOR CHOICE FOR FAT LOSS AND DOES NOT CONTRIBUTE MUCH
DIETARY CALORIC DEFICIT REIGNS SUPREME.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
So no more b u l l s h i t from you “RSissy boy”
GET FAMILIAR WITH THE FACTS.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
No one walks 26 miles every single day for a month not even the Maasai. SO this type of exercise burns far more than walking just 6 miles (walking 6 miles even burns FAR more than HIIT) so HOW DO YOU EXPECT HIIT TO DO ANYTHING?
DIET is where 90% of results come from for fat loss. EXERCISE IS FOR HEALTH MAINLY NOT FAT LOSS
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
Let’s do another example if that same 250 pound man WALKS A MARATHON (75 calories burned per mile walked) he will burn 1,950 calories after walking the 26 mile Marathon . If he walked a Marathon EVERYDAY for a month he would burn 58,500 calories . That is around 16-17 pounds in a month BY EXERCISE ALONE- WALKING A MARATHON EVERY SINGLE DAY FOR A MONTH
That is A LOT of work
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
If this 250 pound guy ran 3 miles EVERY SINGLE DAY FOR ONE MONTH he would burn off 14,160 calories roughly 4 pounds.
That is ONLY 4 pounds of weight loss in amonth from doing an exercise THAT BURNS TWICE THAT OF HIIT per workout
EXERCISE ALONE IS SIMPLY A VERY POOR WAY TO LOSE FAT.
HIIT promoters TAKE NOTE. STOP SCAMMING.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
Let me interject here. Here are the facts regardless of if you chose to accept the facts.
Let’s take a large guy - 250 pounds. If this guy goes out and runs 3 miles this will burn FAR MORE calories than HIIT, MUCH MORE.
The formula is 250 X.63 for the NET calorie burn, the REAL calorie burn. He will have burned 472 calories. THIS IS TWICE the calorie burn of of HIIT .
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
EPOC amounts to NEXT TO NOTHING.
LOOK UP LYLE MCDONALD and hsi DETAILED explanation
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
Further more SISSY BOY
DO YOU knwo the metabolic rate of muscle
6 calories per pound per day
6 that is it
,MUSCLE DOES NOT BURN MANY CALORIES AT REST YOU FOOL
LASTLY the body does nto need to be overmuscled
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
There is NOTHING magical about sprinting. It is all about CALORIE BURN
HIIT does NOT burn many calories. It sounds impressive to say things liek 3 times greater fat lossBUT IF YOU ACTUALLY LOOKED UP THE STUDY THIS GUY CITES IN THE VIDEO YOU DOUCHE, IT FOUND
AFTER 15 WEEKS INTERVAL SUBJECTS LOST 5.5 POUNDS
NOT THAT IMPRESSIVE
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
NO, I am NOT misleading at all. I am for WALKING NOT staedy state running.
WALKING will NOT cause muscle loss and WILL burn fat. and CALORIES if done long enough
SPRINTS HAVE NEVER BEEN SHOWN BETTER FOR FAT LOSS
THAT is my point. Include them for improved hormonal tone , BUT THEY DO NOT BURN MANY CALORIES COMPARED TO WALKING 60 MINUTES
HIIT marketers are SCAMMERS
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
unethical? Are you shitting me?????????? Everyone Avoid this user she is taking part in spamming lies to mislead people into the wrong direction regarding fat loss/muscle retention.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
I am just against the FALSE PROMOTION and LIES of the HIIT marketers.
It is VERY MISLEADING AND UNETHICAL
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
ANOTHER EXAMPLE:
The study above that this guy’s video cites FOUND:
after 15 weeks INTERVALS SUBJECTS LOST ONLY 5.5 pounds THAT is the REAL FIGURE, but it does NOT grab your attention does it?
That is NOT a lot of weight.
HIIT PROMOTERS ARE NOTHING MORE THAN SALES PITCHES to make you THINK it is better.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
after 20 weeks steady state subjects lost ONLY 1.0 kg. That is no good either.
SO REALIZE, HIIT has NEVER been shown superior for fat loss. NEVER.
CALORIE DEFICIT is what causes fat loss.
HIIT promoters LIE
FURTHER MORE DID YOU KNWO SPRINTERS DO NOT DO HIIT? They wait as long as 15 minutes between sprints.
LASTLY 75% of a sprinters trainign is LOW INTENSITY TEMPO RUNS.
Sprinters do WEIGHTS, LOW INTENSITY RUNS, MEDICIEN BALL etc and yes sprinting too
TOTAL VOLUME
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
To RSissyboy :
I have explained this NUMEROUS times beyond counting. EPOC amounts to NOTHING. HIIT itself does NOT burn any more than around 200 calories.
Walking 2 hours will burn HUNDERDS of more calories than HIIT.
Lastly, there was NO “9 times greater fat loss” in the Tremblay study. IF you had read the FULL TEXT you would see that the interval subjects afetr 15 weeks LOST ONLY 0.1 KG
That is TERRIBLE.
DIET is for fat loss. EAT LESS. Steady state or sprints are IMMATERIAL
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
What is your BMI? chances are if your very thin and you have a belly then that means you have too much fat for the amount of lean(Muscle, water, etc) on your body. So yes, if you lost the fat you would be VERY thin.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
Ever stop to think about the bodyfat:muscle ratio?? Elite marathoners have lower bodyfat than sprinters… Ok what about muscle ratio to that bodyfat?
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
First off, STOP USING FRAGMENTS AND LEARN TO WRITE A PROPER SENTENCE. Second, if what you say is true show proof because as far as I see you are pulling shit out of your ass. HIIT is overhyped…? I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt so please provide proof that you are right.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
AND as the genious Lyle McDonald points out:
when sprinters do happen to sprint- IT DOES NOT EVEN REMOTELY RESEMBLE HIIT, NOT IN THE LEAST
The rest times coud not be more different
ALL ADVERTISING IS LIES. HIIT PROMOTERS TALK UP THEIR STUFF IT IS ALL B.S.
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
and PLEASE do not trot out the FARICAL sprinter vs marathoner
Did YOU KNOW 75 % of an elite sprinters workout is LOW INTENSITY temo runs?
Probably not……
HIIT proponents stop at nothing. LYLE MCDONALD TEARS THEM TO SHREDS. Sprinrers TOTAL VOLUME. the LIFTING the tempo runs, the medicine ball throws the sprinst ARE the reason they are cut
April 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am
There are MANY factors that can DOMINATE the effects of vigorous activity:
Morning sprints that got you so tired you could not do anything the rest of the day is NOT good for fat loss
Out eating your workout because it made you RAVENOUS
HIIT burns ONLY 200 calories. NOT MUCH EPOC is meaningless another 30-50 over 24 hours.